Pluto Blog






<< May 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed




Monday, May 19, 2008
Managers and PR: One Thing Is Clear

Please feel free to publish this article and resource box
in your ezine, newsletter, offline publication or website.
A copy would be appreciated at bobkelly@TNI.net.
Word count is 1195 including guidelines and resource box.
Robert A. Kelly © 2004.
Managers and PR: One Thing Is Clear
As a business, non-profit or association manager, you
have a clear choice when you set up your public relations.
Arrange your resources to generate a variety of product
and service plugs on radio, and in newspapers and in
magazines. Or, use a broader, more comprehensive and
workable public relations blueprint to alter key external
audience perceptions that lead to changed behaviors –
behaviors you will need to reach your managerial
objectives.
Which is why it also seems clear that your department,
division or subsidiary can fail or succeed depending on
how well you employ a crucial dynamic like this one:
persuade your key external stakeholders with the greatest
impacts on your organization to your way of thinking,
then move them to take actions that help your unit succeed.
Best place to start is with the blueprint itself: People act
on their own perception of the facts before them, which
leads to predictable behaviors about which something can
be done. When we create, change or reinforce that opinion
by reaching, persuading and moving-to-desired-action the
very people whose behaviors affect the organization the
most, the public relations mission is accomplished.
As you can see, because they are important, publicity
placements are still part of the blueprint – they just are not,
and should not be the tail that wags the PR dog.
So, if this approach to public relations is of interest, you
may be amazed at what could happen. Fresh proposals for
strategic alliances and joint ventures; Customers starting to
make repeat purchases, and even prospects starting to do
business with you; welcome bounces in show room visits;
rising membership applications, and community leaders
beginning to seek you out; new approaches by capital givers
and specifying sources not to mention politicians and
legislators viewing you as a key member of the business,
non-profit or association communities.
Who shoulders the work needed to produce such results?
Your own full-time public relations staff? A few folks
assigned by the corporate office to your unit? An outside
PR agency team? No matter where they come from, they
need to be committed to you, to the PR blueprint and to
its implementation, starting with key audience perception
monitoring.
Please keep in mind that simply because someone describes
him/herself as a public relations person doesn’t guarantee
they’ve bought the whole shebang. So by all means make
certain the public relations people assigned to your unit
really believe – deep down -- why it’s SO important to know
how your most important outside audiences perceive your
operations, products or services. Make sure they accept the
reality that perceptions almost always lead to behaviors that
can help or hurt your unit.
Layout your plan – your blueprint -- for monitoring and
gathering perceptions by questioning members of your most
important outside audiences. Questions like these: how much
do you know about our chief executive? Have you had prior
contact with us and were you pleased with the interchange?
How much do you know about our services or products and
employees? Have you experienced problems with our people
or procedures?
Use professional survey firms in the perception monitoring
phases of your program if you can afford them. But your PR
people are also in the perception and behavior business and can
pursue the same objective: identify untruths, false assumptions,
unfounded rumors, inaccuracies, misconceptions and any other
negative perception that might translate into hurtful behaviors.
Now, set your PR goal, one that aims to do something about
the worst distortions you turned up during your key audience
perception monitoring. It could be to straighten out that
dangerous misconception, correct that gross inaccuracy,
or stop that potentially fatal rumor dead in its tracks.
With your PR goal established, select the right strategy, one
that tells you how to proceed. But keep in mind that there are
only three strategic options available to you when it comes to
handling a perception and opinion challenge. Change existing
perception, create perception where there may be none, or
reinforce it. Since the wrong strategy pick will taste like
mustard on your pancakes, be certain the new strategy fits
comfortably with your new public relations goal. You don’t
want to select “change” when the facts dictate a “reinforce”
strategy.
With that homework complete, write a moving message and
aim it at members of your target audience. Because crafting
action-forcing language to persuade an audience to your way
of thinking is tough work, you need your best writer because
s/he must create some very special, corrective language.
Words that are not only compelling, persuasive and believable,
but clear and factual if they are to correct something and shift perception/opinion towards your point of view leading to the
behaviors you are targeting.
Run it by the entire PR team for impact and persuasiveness.
Then, select the communications tactics most likely to carry
your message to the attention of your target audience. You
can pick from dozens that are available. From speeches,
facility tours, emails and brochures to consumer briefings,
media interviews, newsletters, personal meetings and many
others. But be sure that the tactics you pick are known to
reach folks just like your audience members.
You may decide to unveil it before smaller meetings and
presentations rather than using higher-profile news releases
since a message is often dependent for its credibility on the
means used to deliver it.

Before long, questions about progress will be heard, which
tells you and your PR team to get busy on a second perception
monitoring session with members of your external audience.
You’ll want to use many of the same questions used in the
first benchmark session. Difference this time is that you will
be watching very carefully for signs that the bad news
perception is being altered in your direction.
Should the program begin to slow down, you can always
accelerate matters by adding more communications tactics
as well as increasing their frequencies.
When it comes down to it, you want your new PR blueprint
to persuade your most important outside stakeholders to your way
of thinking, then move them to behave in a way that leads to
the success of your department, division or subsidiary.
And, when you think about it, we are fortunate indeed that
our key stakeholder audiences behave like everyone else –
they act upon their perceptions of the facts they hear about
you and your operation. Leaving you little choice but to
deal promptly and effectively with those perceptions by
doing what is necessary to reach and move your key external
audiences to actions you desire.

Posted at 07:27 am by blogpluto
Make a comment  

Is it Possible to Appease Evil?

Neville Chamberlain in 1938 tried to appease Hitler, but Hitler would not be appeased. You see, 1938 was a terrible time for Europe. Hitler’s Nazis were running through sovereign nations like a hot knife through butter. England and its European allies were deeply alarmed to say the least, and they hoped to negotiate peace with Hitler without having to go to war against him. Chamberlain, Prime Minister of England, flew to Munich to meet with Hitler.
From this meeting comes the Munich Agreement which effectively allows Adolf Hitler to annex Czechoslovakia (I guess the Czechs were suppose to like the agreement or lump it). Chamberlain’s belief that satisfying each of Hitler’s escalating demands for control of more and more territory was naïve. Nevertheless, the Prime Minister flies home and meets the British press on his arrival. Holding up a piece of paper for all to see, Chamberlain cries out, “We’ve achieved peace in our times.” One year later, Hitler invades Poland and the Munich Agreement is now worth no more than the paper it’s written on. England is forced to declare war on Hitler, and Chamberlain falls to Winston Churchill. Hitler could not be appeased.
Someone real smart once said that those who fail to learn the hard lessons of history are doomed to repeat them. I’ll give you a modern day example. Obviously modern Europe has not learned the lessons of Chamberlain’s appeasement policies because they are turning a deaf ear to Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities and saber rattling against Israel and the West in general. Iran is boasting of her ability to strike Israel with nuclear weapons and no one is denouncing them but the United States. I guess the Europeans think to do so would be promoting a policy of “preemption” and that is evil. (One of the major problems with America’s war in Iraq—according to many Europeans—is America’s preemptive policies toward terrorists.) I believe that very soon—within the next couple of years—Iran and Israel will be at war. I also believe that Iran will use nuclear weapons against Israel. Will this be the beginning of the end?
Does the Bible say much about the Second Coming of Jesus Christ? It says more about His return than it does about His first coming. Even the Old Testament prophets spoke about the restoration of the nation Israel and the Messiah’s Kingly rule from Jerusalem, over all the earth. In John’s Gospel, chapter 14 and beginning with verse one, it says: “You believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many mansions. If it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go to prepare a place for you, I WILL COME AGAIN and receive you unto myself that where I am, there you may be also.”
Often Jesus denounced the religious people of His day because they could predict the weather by reading the signs in the atmosphere, but they were ignorant regarding the prophetic words of His first and second comings. In Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus was quick to point out that His Second Coming would be announced by signs. He said that when wars escalate, extreme weather patterns prevail, pestilence destroys thousands, earthquakes are common, stars fall from the heavens, and the sun turns dark, then we are to know that Jesus is near, even at the door. Now I’ve never been much of a “star gazer” but recently something keeps prompting me to look up. I believe that the Holy Spirit is directing me to stay alert to the signs of the times because spiritual lethargy in this hour would dull my senses to the sudden coming of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. And I certainly don’t want that to happen. What about you?

Posted at 07:24 am by blogpluto
Make a comment  

Next Page